Prospective authors are invited to submit original papers in standard format describing new theoretical and/or experimental research. Submitted paper will be peer reviewed by conference committees, and accepted papers will be included into ICNSER2022 Conference Proceedings which will be published and submitted to major databases. Any submission must not have been, or will not be published elsewhere or submitted to another publication before the review notification date of ICNSER.
Email: firstname.lastname@example.orgTemplate Downloads
Abstract-only submission will be included in conference program, but will not published, and authors will be invited to give an oral/poster presentation on site.
Prospective authors are invited to submit full original papers (not being considered for publication elsewhere) in standard format describing new theoretical and/or experimental research. Each accepted paper must be presented by one of the authors and accompanied by at least one full ICNSER2022 registration.
Our Review Process is Based on Double-Blind Peer-Review
We recommend peer double blind review for all papers before publication. The conference’s Technical Program Committee, nominated by the Technical Program Chair, collaborates to review and discuss submitted papers. The anonymity of the reviewer ensures that the reviewer can give an honest and impartial evaluation of the paper.
Initial manuscript evaluation The Chair TPC first evaluates all manuscripts. It is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the Conference. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to review “Novelty and Originality, Scientific Soundness, Importance and Impact on the Research Area, Relevance to the Conference and Completeness of Presentation”.
Each reviewer will be assigned to not exceed 3 papers. The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the referees, usually 2-4weeks for one paper reviewing.
Decision and Revision
Authors will get notified after the peer review process.
The paper is accepted and do not need any modification.
ACCEPT WITH MINOR REVISION
The paper will be accepted after minor revision. In this case, the reviewed paper will only be reviewed by the editor.
MAJOR REVISION NEEDED
The paper will be sent to be reviewed by the original reviewers.
The paper will not be accepted due to major deficiencies. And it is not recommended to be resubmitted.
Presentation GuidelinesOral Presentation
>>Prepare the PowerPoint or PDF for your presentation.
>>You may copy your presentation files into the laptop of the conference staff, or just use your own.
>>12 minutes to present, and 3 minutes for Q&A.
>>As a Poster Presenter it is important that you display your results clearly to attract people who have an interest in your work and your paper. Your poster should cover the KEY POINTS of your work. The ideal poster should be designed to attract attention, provide a brief overview of your work, and initiate discussion and questions.
>>The size of the poster should be 841mm width x 1189mm height
>>You should make the poster and bring it to the conference.